A blog about how plants will respond to climate change
by David Gallagher
What is climate
change?
Climate change describes the unprecedented rate of global
warming that is altering the climate of Earth. Carbon dioxide (CO2 )is the principle gas driving
climate change. Atmospheric CO2 is increasing due to the human activities of
burning fossil fuels, deforestation, and poor agricultural practices. Carbon
dioxide levels in the atmosphere have increased by 40% since the Industrial
Revolution, contributing to global heat retention and elevated atmospheric
temperatures, as well as an array of other ecological impacts. For
example, there is a cumulative loss of glacier mass that
is rapidly occurring. The Himalayan mountain ranges are comprised of an
extensive glacier network that feeds rivers that comprise the largest river
run-off system in the world. Changes in water run-off would influence water
resources, agriculture, infrastructure, livelihoods, biodiversity and cultures
and would affect the lives of about 40% of the world’s population. Additionally,
extreme weather events such
as heat waves, wildfires, storms and flash floods are expected to increase and
have been linked to climate change. From 1987 to 1998, the average number of
climate-related disasters was 195. From 2000 to 2006, the average was 365, representing
an increase of 87%. Atmospheric CO2 is still increasing
exponentially and will likely double (to 700 parts per million (ppm)) within
the next century. Collectively, these impacts are serious threats to
global ecosystems and ultimately, human welfare. Although the mitigation of
increasing atmospheric CO2 levels is a pressing issue for policy
makers at the national and international levels, many of the proposed solutions
have prohibitive costs and uncertain or already documented detrimental
ecological impacts. Understanding how plants respond to elevated CO2 levels
could help guide proposed solutions for climate change, from reforestation
strategies to agricultural practices.
The cumulative loss of glacier mass by global region. The data are reported in sea-level equivalent (SLE) rise in millimeters (mm) |
Atmospheric CO2 concentration for the past 10,000 years. Notice the start of the exponential increase since the beginning of the 19th century (start of the Industrial Revolution) |
What do
photosynthesis and climate change have in common?
Plants need CO2 and the atmospheric levels of CO2
are increasing. Plants covert CO2 into complex carbohydrates through the process
of photosynthesis. Photosynthesis is composed of two sets of reactions: the
light reactions that convert light energy into chemical energy in the form of
the high energy molecules ATP and NADPH; the Calvin cycle then uses the high
energy molecules produced in the light reactions to convert (fix) CO2 into
the carbohydrate sucrose (among other products). These complex carbohydrates
enter into the food chain through herbivores (plant eaters, like a cow). Herbivores
are then consumed by carnivores (meat eaters, like humans). Photosynthesis is
the route by which energy from the sun enters the biosphere and drives the
process of life. Without photosynthesis life on this planet would come to an
end. Photosynthesis is the major pathway by which CO2 is removed
from the atmosphere. Approximately 50% of carbon that is emitted into the
atmosphere is currently removed by plants through photosynthesis. Plants are
the basis of what is called the carbon cycle and regulate the amount of carbon
(in the form of CO2 ) in the atmosphere. It can easily be argued
that measuring the effects of increased CO2 levels on the process of
photosynthesis is important in understanding how climate change will impact
humanity.
The process of photosynthesis in a chloroplast of a plant. Photosynthesis is the conversion of light energy into chemical energy |
What is the carbon
cycle?
Carbon
like many elements, gets cycled through ecosystems. Think of CO2 and carbon as the same thing. The
amount of carbon that is available for storage (removed from the atmosphere) in
a ecosystem is called net ecosystem production (NEP), which is a fundamental
property of ecosystems. Ecosystems can either be autotrophic (carbon storage
takes place), as in a typical forest or grassland or heterotrophic (carbon is
entering the atmosphere) as in cities and many lakes and rivers. In particular,
plant assemblages like tropical rainforests and large grasslands (like the
Great Plains) have high rates of net primary productivity (NPP) and is the amount of CO2
converted into plant biomass (gross primary productivity or GPP) less the amount of CO2 used by the plant for respiration and can directly affect the magnitude and
direction of global climate change via the cycling of carbon through the
ecosystem and consequently change the amount of carbon stored in the soil and as biomass. The
concept of a source-sink relationship between CO2 and soil is
useful because if you think of the atmosphere as the source of CO2 and the soil as the sink of CO2 , then you can imagine that you want
ecosystems to favor the sinking (storage) of CO2 so that it does not stay in the
atmosphere and drive climate change. Any change to photosynthetic rate can
change the amount of CO2 stored in the soil and as biomass.
What does this mean
for photosynthesis?
It should be clear that a change in
efficiency of photosynthesis can have dramatic effects on atmospheric CO2 levels. Land plants utilize one of three modes of
photosynthesis: C3, C4 (so called because the CO2 is initially incorporated into
either 3-carbon or 4-carbon compounds) and CAM, a special case of C4. C3
photosynthesis is the most prevalent photosynthetic pathway and is found in
about 90% of all known land plants, including important crops like barley,
wheat, tomatoes and cotton and most species of tree. This form of
photosynthesis is the most efficient in climates not exposed to temperature
extremes or drought. C4 and CAM photosynthetic pathways have evolved from the
C3 pathway as adaptations to hot, arid conditions, as they result in more
efficient uptake of CO2 and more efficient use of water. While only about 3% of all known plants (7,000-8,000
species) use the C4 pathway (including the key crop corn), they are common
components of the tropical and subtropical grassland, savannah and marsh
habitats, and collectively account for 20-25% of global primary productivity.
About 20,000 species utilize
the CAM pathway (primarily cacti). Most grow in arid ecosystems and
collectively contribute relatively little to global net primary productivity
but they are ecologically important in areas where relatively few plant species
grow. The main difference between all three pathways is that in C3 plants, Rubisco,
the enzyme that converts CO2 into a three carbon molecule that
is a precursor to sucrose (Calvin cycle) is directly involved in the initial uptake of CO2. In C4 plants, a different enzyme
(PEP carboxylase) binds to CO2 and coverts it to malic acid. Malic acid is then transported
into a specialized cell and reconverted to CO2. The
specialized cell, called a bundle sheath cell, contains Rubisco and is where
the Calvin cycle then takes place. C4 photosynthesis is more efficient because it only allows Rubisco to
bind to CO2. The reason C4 plants have this extra
energy-consuming step is because Rubisco also binds to oxygen (O2 )
in a process called photorespiration.
What is photorespiration?
Photorespiration is an alternative but less efficient
pathway in which Rubsico binds to O2 instead CO2 . Photorespiration occurs frequently
in C3 plants because O2 and CO2 compete with one
another and each have an equal chance of binding to Rubisco. The oxygenation reaction (where O2
binds) forms
phosphoglycolate, which represents carbon lost from the photosynthetic pathway
and it also inhibits photosynthesis if it is allowed to accumulate in the
plant. Photorespiration reduces the rate of photosynthesis in plants by
diverting energy from photosynthetic reactions to photorespiratory reactions. It
is less efficient then C4 photosynthesis.
Elevated levels of CO2
favor C3 photosynthesis.
Photosynthesis by terrestrial vegetation accounts for
about half of the carbon that annually cycles (the carbon cycle) between the
earth’s surface and the atmosphere. Most C3 land plants respond to elevated CO2 by increased photosynthetic capacity.
The ability of plants to produce additional biomass because of elevated CO2 levels is one of the reasons that
terrestrial plants have become increasingly greater carbon sinks over the past
50 years, keeping CO2 build-up in the atmosphere at 40-50% of what it would otherwise be due to
emissions by human activities. C4 plants respond similarly to C3 plants but to
a substantially lesser degree because these photosynthetic pathways already
function to minimize photorespiration. In summary, elevated CO2 levels favor C3 photosynthesis.
If C3 plants respond to higher CO2
concentrations, do we need to really worry about additional CO2 emissions?
If it were only that simple. Some photosynthetic-climate
change models show an increase in global
plant productivity and an increase in global plant biomass and consequently an
increase in the removal of CO2 from the atmosphere. Other studies suggest that
plants will eventual acclimatize to higher CO2 levels. It has been shown that
long term exposure to elevated CO2 leads to the accumulation of carbohydrates in the
photosynthetic tissues of the plant and this in turn leads to a reduction in
photosynthetic rates. Additionally, although increased CO2 makes C3 plants grow larger initially,
plants growing larger and faster need more nutrients, such as nitrogen (N) and
water. These resources may not be available depending on how climate change
will impact a particular ecosystem. As well as this down-regulation of photosynthetic
capacity, plants that respond to elevated CO2 also produce tissue with lower
nutrient concentrations (reduced leaf N content). This has clear implications
for herbivores and ultimately humans. The implications of nutrient poor agricultural
crops could have serious implications for food security for a growing world
population.
A Final Word
Plants grow and develop in response to a range of abiotic factors. The most
important abiotic factors are the availability of CO2, water and mineral
nutrients, temperature and light. It follows that the distribution of different
plant assemblages is influenced by the climate, since climate determines
temperature and precipitation. One of the most pressing questions is how
climate change will effect terrestrial vegetation.
“All
flesh is grass” -Isaiah
Calochortus obispoensis (San Luis Obispo star tulip) is endemic to San Luis Obispo County and is in the lily family. Photographed in West Cuesta. |
References
Chen, D.X., H.W. Hunt, and J.A. Morgan. 1996. Responses of a C-3 and C-4 perennial grass
to CO2 enrichment
and climate change: Comparison between model predictions and experimental data.
Ecological Modelling 87:11-27.
Cryan, P.M., and R.M.R. Barclay. 2009. Causes of bat
fatalities at wind turbines: hypothesis and predictions. Journal of Mammalogy 90:
1330-1340.
Fangmeier,
A., L. de Temmerman, C. Black, K. Persson, and V. Vorne. 2002. Effects of elevated CO2 and/or ozone on
nutrient concentrations and nutrient uptake of potatoes. European
Journal of Agronomy 17: 353-368.
Houghton,
R., 2007. Balancing the Carbon Budget.
Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 35:313–47.
Lovett, G.M., J.J. Cole, and M.L. Pace. 2006. Is net
ecosystem production equal to ecosystem carbon accumulation. Ecosystems 9:1-4.
Manning, M. 2007. Climate Change 2007: Observations and Drivers of Climate Change.
Presentation for IPCC AR4, Working Group I, Support Unit.
Nemani, R.R,
C.D. Keeling, H. Hashimoto, W.M. Jolly, S.C. Piper, C.J. Tucker, R.B. Myneni,
and S.W. Running. 2003. Climate-Driven
Increases in Global Terrestrial Net Primary Production from 1982 to 1999.
Science 300:1560-1563.
Pachauri, R.K., and A. Reisinger. 2007. Climate change 2007:
synthesis report. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC.
Richards,
K. R., and C. Stokes. 2004. A review of forest sequestration cost studies: A
dozen years of research. Climatic Change 63:1-48
Smith, T.M., and R.L. Smith. 2009. Elements of Ecology.
Pearson Education, Inc., San Francisco, CA.
Taiz, L., and E. Zeiger. 2010. Plant Physiology 5th
Edition. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
Vitousek,
P.M. 1994. Beyond Global Warming:
Ecology and Global Change. Ecology 75:1861-1876.
Very good points you wrote here..Great stuff...I think you've made some truly interesting points.Keep up the good work. Cbdöl schweiz
ReplyDelete